REIGN NBA
NBA Dominance, Measured Across Eras

The REIGN
Score

How dominant was an NBA player relative to his peers in a given season? REIGN (Relative Era Impact vs Game Norms) measures a player's season output against the NBA league average per team per game. The result: a single number that captures dominance across any era of professional basketball.

Player Season Total / League Average per Game = REIGN Score
Stat Category
Filter Era
Filter Season
Search Player
Points: All-Time REIGN
Top NBA single-season performances · Click a row for details
# Player Season Total REIGN

Head to Head

Pick two NBA players from different decades. Compare their REIGN Scores, accounting for the league they played in.

Player A
VS
Player B
VS
Select two players above to compare REIGN Scores

What Is the REIGN Score?

REIGN: Relative Era Impact vs Game Norms

"How dominant was this NBA player, relative to his peers, for a given stat in a particular season?"

The NBA is a different sport than it was in 1946. Pace, rules, roster sizes, the three-point line, league expansion. All of it makes raw counting stats difficult for cross-era comparisons. A 2,000-point season meant something very different in 1962 than it does in 2025.

The REIGN Score sidesteps that problem. It measures each player's output relative to what the average team produced per game that season. The higher the score, the more a player dominated his era in that stat.

The Formula

// For each stat, we use the league-wide average per team per game
// for that season (sourced from Basketball Reference).

REIGN = Player's Season Total / League Avg Per Team Per Game

One division. The denominator is the average number of [points / rebounds / assists / etc.] that a single NBA team produced per game that season, sourced directly from Basketball Reference's historical league averages. The result tells you how many team-games' worth of that stat the player generated on his own.

Example

In 2023-24, the average NBA team scored 114.2 points per game. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 2,254 total points that season:

REIGN = 2,254 / 114.2 = 19.7

SGA's REIGN Score of 19.7 means he single-handedly produced the scoring output of an entire NBA team across nearly 20 full games.

Now compare that to Michael Jordan in 1986-87. The average team scored 109.9 PPG that year, and Jordan put up 3,041 points:

REIGN = 3,041 / 109.9 = 27.7

Jordan's REIGN of 27.7 is roughly 40% more dominant than SGA's, despite the 37-year gap between them. That gap is exactly what REIGN makes visible: dominance relative to the era, regardless of when they played.

Why It Works

What It Measures (and What It Doesn't)

REIGN measures relative statistical dominance: how much of a given stat one NBA player produced compared to the league norm of his era. A high REIGN Score means that player was an outlier among his NBA peers.

It does not measure efficiency, defense, leadership, clutch play, or any of the intangibles. A player who scores 25 PPG on 60% shooting and one who scores 25 PPG on 40% shooting get the same REIGN. REIGN doesn't care whether those points came on good or bad shots.

Limitations

Data Sources

All data is sourced from Basketball Reference, the most comprehensive public source for historical NBA statistics.

Each player-season is its own entry. Jordan 1987 and Jordan 1996 are distinct entries, each measured against their own season's league context.

Built By

Alex Lash · Product Manager · Builder · Stathead
REIGN started as a question ("how dominant was Wilt vs. Jordan?") and became this tool.
Built with vanilla HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
LinkedIn

Like this tool?

If REIGN helped settle a debate or taught you something new, consider leaving a tip.

Support the Project